Services
Industries
Case studiesPricing
Resources
Company

AI search optimization for B2B SaaS.

Getting your brand named inside the answers ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews give your buyers. The same work people call AEO, GEO and LLM SEO.

See how citations work

If you read nothing else.

The moves that earn AI citations are the moves that serve a sophisticated human reader: confident, specific, claim-led, structurally clean.

51%of B2B software buyers now start their research in an AI chatbot more often than in Google, according to G2's March 2026 survey of 1,076 buyers.
74AI citations for Da Vinci across six AI platforms, measured July 2026, in a category where most competitors have none
1 to 35MQLs a month from AI referrals at Workwize, mid-2025 to early 2026
In the OverviewOur B2B SaaS SEO guide was cited in Google's AI Overview for "b2b saas seo" in September 2026, and ranked fourth in the results below it.
AEO, GEO and LLM SEO are one discipline.

Different names for structuring content so AI systems can extract, attribute and cite it. The terminology is unsettled. The work is consistent.

The same patterns serve people.

Systems cite content with direct claims, inline definitions, structural markers and proprietary data. Optimising for AI search makes content better for humans, not worse.

The technical layer matters more than most agencies admit.

Server-rendered HTML, schema, llms.txt and entity-level structured data each affect citation eligibility on different surfaces.

The metrics are different.

Citation rate per query category and brand mention share are the wins. Most measurement has not been rebuilt to track them.

It does not replace SEO.

Both run in parallel on the same technical foundations. Programs that optimise for one surface alone lose to programs that do both.

What AI search optimization is.

Traditional SEO competes for a position on a page of links. This competes to be inside the answer.

AI search optimization is the practice of structuring content so systems like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Gemini cite your brand inside the answers they generate.

When a VP of Sales asks an assistant which CRM suits an outbound team, the reply names three or four vendors. If you are named, you are in the evaluation. If you are not, your ranking is irrelevant, because nobody reached a results page. Citation patterns are sticky, which is why early positions compound.

AssistantIllustration

For outbound teams under 50 reps, three tools come up most: Yourtool 1, Pipedrive 2 and HubSpot Sales Hub 3.

  1. yourtool.com/compare/hubspot
  2. pipedrive.com/features
  3. hubspot.com/products/sales

AEO, GEO, LLM SEO, AI search optimization.

Four names, one discipline. Where this workstream sits in the wider plan is in the B2B SaaS SEO strategy guide, and the terminology argument is in GEO versus SEO.

AEOGEOLLM SEOAI search optimizationExtract. Attribute.Cite.

Answer engine optimization. Used by marketers and agency buyers. Framed around the answer box. Usually arrives with an FAQ and schema workstream attached.

How AI search systems decide what to cite.

Retrieval pulls candidate pages. Generation writes the answer and cites the sources it used. A page can be retrieved and still not be cited.

Authority

Domain trust, backlink profile, brand recognition. The signals search has weighted for years carry into citation eligibility.

Specificity

Direct answers, named entities, proprietary numbers, concrete examples. A page that gives the number gets cited over a page that says "converts well".

Structure

Headings that match the question, chunks that can be lifted without losing meaning, schema that disambiguates the entity.

Recency

Recent publication and update dates. SaaS evaluation queries are time-sensitive, and AI search weighs recency more than classic search does.

The full breakdown is in how AI search engines retrieve and cite content, the do-list in the B2B SaaS AEO checklist, and the query work in the keyword research guide.

Stage 1RetrievalDoes the page show up at all? Search visibility decides.
Stage 2GenerationIs it the most useful source for this exact question? Structure decides.
ResultCitationYour brand, named inside the answer.

The structural patterns that earn citations.

These are not style preferences. They are what a system can parse when it writes the answer.

A direct answer in the first 100 words.

Each section opens with a declarative answer to the question its heading implies. Those opening sentences are lifted first because they parse cleanly and stand alone.

Inline definitions of technical terms.

Define a term on first use. The expert reader skims it. The system uses it to work out which entity you mean.

Structural markers as anchors.

Numbered lists, comparison tables, named frameworks, explicit step counts. A claim wrapped in "three approaches" lifts more cleanly than the same claim buried in prose.

Proprietary data as the hook.

Systems prefer to cite the source of a number over a page quoting it. Your own benchmark becomes the citation.

"When it comes to outbound, there are many factors teams should consider, and results can vary widely depending on a number of things, though many experts agree conversion has room to improve."

Nothing here can be lifted. No number, no definition, no claim.

Citation-friendly content, the writing layer.

The voice that gets cited is the voice that works for a sophisticated reader: direct, claim-led, no hedging. The craft is in the content writing guide.

Gets skippedGets cited
Generated bulk contentTwo-paragraph units that stand alone when lifted
Listicles that list without arguingOne sharp argument per piece
Hedged opening paragraphsInline definitions on first use
"Studies show", "experts agree"Named numbers, named companies, named workflows

Schema, llms.txt and the technical layer.

Most citation failures we audit trace back here. The full rendering, indexation and structured-data playbook is in the technical SEO guide.

Layer 01Schema that does work

Organization schema disambiguates the publisher. Service and Product schema signal commercial intent. Validation errors are a downgrade signal.

organization.jsonldExample
{ "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Yourtool",
  "sameAs": [ "linkedin.com/company/yourtool",
              "g2.com/products/yourtool" ] }

Surface by surface.

The patterns above earn baseline eligibility everywhere. Each surface adds a little on top.

Surface 01ChatGPT (web search)

Keep investing in editorial links from authoritative SaaS publications. That authority carries directly into ChatGPT citation eligibility.

ChatGPT (web search)GPT

Answer text, with your page named as a source 1.

  1. yourtool.com
What it weighsAuthorityRecencyNamed expertise

Measuring AI search visibility.

There is no stable ranking position in AI search. Same query, different sessions, different answers. Measure citation rate over a sample of queries.

AI search reportSample
Citation rate18%of 120 tracked queries
Mention share9%of vendor citations
AI-referred visits412this month

A defined query set of 50 to 200 questions, refreshed quarterly, tracked with Profound, Otterly, AthenaHQ or a custom poller.

Ranking position in AI search.It does not exist as a stable metric. Stick to citation rate over a sample.

Number of AI tools deployed.Activity, not outcome.

Pages with FAQPage schema.A precondition for eligibility, not a measure of performance.

What an AI search optimization program includes.

Four workstreams, in the order they have to happen. As part of a full program, from $4,000 a month. As a standalone workstream, $2,000 to $6,000.

Weeks 1 to 3

The audit

50 to 200 questions your buyers actually ask, run across each surface, with today's citation rate recorded by category.

Weeks 2 to 6

The technical layer

Server-rendered HTML, schema that validates, llms.txt, and crawler access. The best page on a blocked domain earns nothing.

Month 2 onward

Content restructuring

Existing pages rewritten into extractable units. Most programs get more from the library they have than from new work.

Months 1 to 18

Authority

Citations follow domain trust. In our client tracking they arrived only after the referring-domain curve bent.

What we will not sell you: instrumentation on a domain with no authority. If your site has nothing for a system to trust, tracking citations measures an absence, and we will say so on the call.

Which assistants already cite you?Send us your domain. You get the answer on the call, surface by surface.

Who does the work.

Named people, not an account-manager layer.

Rizwan Khan
Rizwan KhanFounder. Leads strategy on every program.
Adnan Khan
Adnan KhanCo-founder and Head of SEO. Technical audits and links.
Umar Usman
Umar UsmanCo-founder. Owns delivery.
Ilinka Trenova
Ilinka TrenovaEditorial lead. Every piece passes her edit.

Around fifteen specialists in total. Meet the whole team

What teams ask before they invest in AI search.

Send us your domain. We will tell you on the call which surfaces already cite you and which do not.

How do I optimize for AI search?

Answer the question directly in the first hundred words of any section, define technical terms inline on first use, and structure content into units that stand alone when extracted. Then earn the authority that makes a system trust the source, because structure without trust produces no citations.

What is the best AI for search engine optimization?

No single tool covers it. For citation tracking, Profound, Otterly and AthenaHQ measure across surfaces. For the underlying work, AI helps with research and outlines but should not write the content, since generated bulk carries materially lower citation weight than human-written equivalents.

What will AI SEO optimization be like in 2026?

It already is 2026, and the shape is clear: a large and growing share of B2B SaaS evaluation queries return a synthesized answer, citation patterns are compounding for brands that started in 2024, and the technical bar keeps rising as more crawlers stop rendering JavaScript.

What is the 30 percent rule in AI?

There is no established 30 percent rule in AI search. People usually mean the share of searches that now return an AI-generated answer, which varies by category and keeps rising.

What is the difference between AEO and GEO?

Nothing substantive. Answer engine optimization and generative engine optimization describe the same work. AEO is the term marketers use, GEO originated in 2023 academic research and is preferred by enterprise SEO teams. Judge the work, not the acronym.

How is AI search optimization different from traditional SEO?

Traditional SEO competes for a position among links and is measured as ranking. AI search optimization competes to be inside the generated answer and is measured as citation rate across a query set. The technical foundations overlap heavily. The content structure and the metrics do not.

How long before AI citations appear?

Expect one to two quarters, and only after authority starts moving. In our client tracking, citations followed the referring-domain curve rather than preceding it, which is the single most useful thing we know about this discipline.

What is llms.txt and do we need one?

A markdown file at your site root telling language models which pages matter and how to summarise them. Adoption is incomplete, the gains are modest, and it costs an afternoon. Publish one, and do not expect it to substitute for the technical and authority work above it.

Want this AI search playbook run on your B2B SaaS site?

Thirty minutes. We audit your current AI search visibility, find the structural gaps in your content, and tell you whether an AI search workstream is the right next investment for your stage. Even if the answer is no.

Or email Rizwan

Hi Rizwan, I'm from . We want to and I'd like an AI search audit. Reach me at .

Opens the calendar with this filled in. Nothing is stored until you book.